Matter of Derr v. United Nations Dev. Corp.

2024 NY Slip Op 31368(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedApril 19, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 31368(U) (Matter of Derr v. United Nations Dev. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Derr v. United Nations Dev. Corp., 2024 NY Slip Op 31368(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Derr v United Nations Dev. Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 31368(U) April 19, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160318/2023 Judge: John J. Kelley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 160318/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JOHN J. KELLEY PART 56M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 160318/2023 In the Matter of MOTION DATE 04/19/2024 RICHARD DERR, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 Petitioner,

-v- DECISION, ORDER, AND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORP. and C&W FACILITY SERVICES, INC., JUDGMENT

Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 were read on this motion to/for PREACTION DISCLOSURE .

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 3102(c), the petitioner seeks pre-action disclosure

from the respondents, compelling them to disclose documents and records concerning

inspections, complaints, maintenance records, invoices, permits, repair records, and violations

with respect to the freight elevator located at 1 United Nations Plaza, New York, New York

10017 for a period of 10 years prior to May 20, 2021, elevator maintenance contracts pertaining

to that elevator that were in effect on May 20, 2021, video footage of the petitioner’s May 20,

2021 accident on that elevator, and incident reports, photographs, investigation documents,

witness statements, and memoranda pertaining to that accident. He also seeks documents

referable to New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) Permit No. M00318786-Il-EL. The

respondents separately answer the petition. The petition is granted to the extent that the

respondent C&W Facility Services, Inc. (C&W), is directed to provide the petitioners with any

documents, records, and videos in its possession that are responsive to the petitioner’s

demands, other than those referable to the DOB permit. The petition is denied as academic as

to the respondent United Nations Development Corp. (UNDC) with respect to all of the 160318/2023 DERR, RICHARD vs. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 160318/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

documents sought other than those referable to the DOB permit, and denied on the merits as to

both respondents with respect to the documents referable to the permit.

In the October 27, 2023 order to show initiating this proceeding, the petitioner had

sought pre-action disclosure with respect to a freight elevator located at 2 United Nations Plaza

in Manhattan. In his petition, the petitioner claimed that he had been involved in an accident in

that elevator on May 20, 2021, and that he needed those documents and videos in order to

frame a complaint sounding in negligence. The respondents informed the petitioner that, in fact,

the subject accident occurred at 1 United Nations Plaza. Consequently, this court issued an

amended order to show cause, dated March 29, 2024, that corrected the location of the elevator

as to which the petitioner was seeking documents and videos. After service of the amended

order to show cause upon the respondents, the respondent United Nations Development Corp.

(UNDC) agreed to provide the petitioner, in a shared file computer format, all of the documents

and videos responsive to his demand, other than those referable to the permit. Both UNDC and

C&W, however, opposed the branch of the petition seeking documents referable to the DOB

permit, as that permit pertained only to the elevator at 2 United Nations Plaza, which was

irrelevant to the petitioner’s potential tort claims. C&W did not otherwise oppose the petition.

CPLR 3102(c) authorizes a court to permit a party to conduct pre-action disclosure to aid

in framing a complaint and in identifying prospective defendants (see Sims v Metropolitan

Transp. Auth., 123 AD3d 496, 496 [1st Dept 2014]; Walker v Sandberg & Sikorski Corp.

Firestone, Inc., 102 AD3d 415, 415 [1st Dept 2013]; Matter of Champion v Metropolitan Tr.

Auth., 70 AD3d 587, 588 [1st Dept 2010]). A petitioner seeking leave to conduct pre-action

disclosure must demonstrate that he or she has a potentially viable cause of action against

some person or entity, and that the disclosure sought is material and necessary to the proof of

an actionable wrong (see Matter of Woodbridge Structured Funding, LLC v Pissed Consumer,

125 AD3d 508, 508 [1st Dept 2015]; Matter of Peters v Sotheby’s Inc. 34 AD3d 29, 34 [1st Dept

2006]; Liberty Imports v Bourguet, 146 AD2d 535, 536 [1st Dept 1989]). The resort to pre- 160318/2023 DERR, RICHARD vs. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 160318/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/19/2024

action disclosure, however, “is not permissible as a fishing expedition to ascertain whether a

cause of action exists” in the first instance (id. at 536).

The court concludes that the petitioner has established his entitlement to pre-action

disclosure of documents and records concerning inspections, complaints, maintenance records,

invoices, permits, repair records, and violations, with respect to the freight elevator located at 1

United Nations Plaza, New York, New York 10017 for a period of 10 years prior to May 20,

2021, elevator maintenance contracts pertaining to that elevator that were in effect on May 20,

2021, video footage of the petitioner’s May 20, 2021 accident on that elevator, and incident

reports, photographs, investigation documents, witness statements, and memoranda pertaining

to that accident, as he has established that they are necessary to enable him to frame a

complaint sounding in negligence. The court notes, moreover, that UNDC already has agreed

to provide, or already has provided, documents and videos in its possession that are responsive

to those demands. Hence, the branch of the petition seeking those documents and videos must

be denied as academic as to UNDC. Since C&W has not yet provided responsive documents

or videos in its possession, or provided a Jackson affidavit (Jackson v City of New York, 185

AD2d 768 [1st Dept 1992]) attesting that it does not possess such documents or videos, or

describing the particulars of the search that it undertook to locate those documents and videos,

and that the search revealed that the documents and videos no longer existed or couldn’t be

located, the petition must be granted against C&W as to those documents and videos.

The court agrees with the respondents that the petitioner has not established the need

for disclosure of records pertaining to the DOB permit that he identified in his petition, as they

are irrelevant to his ability to frame a complaint alleging negligence in the maintenance and

operation of the elevator in which he claims to have sustained an accident.

Accordingly, it is,

ADJUDGED that the petition is granted insofar as asserted against the respondent C&W

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sims v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
123 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Woodbridge Structured Funding, LLC v. Pissed Consumer & PissedConsumer.com
125 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Peters v. Sotheby's Inc.
34 A.D.3d 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Champion v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
70 A.D.3d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Walker v. Sandberg & Sikorski Corp. Firestone, Inc.
102 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Liberty Imports, Inc. v. Bourguet
146 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Jackson v. City of New York
185 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 31368(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-derr-v-united-nations-dev-corp-nysupctnewyork-2024.