MATTER OF deROSAY

494 S.E.2d 339, 268 Ga. 868, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 150, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 16
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1998
DocketS97Y1846
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 494 S.E.2d 339 (MATTER OF deROSAY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF deROSAY, 494 S.E.2d 339, 268 Ga. 868, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 150, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 16 (Ga. 1998).

Opinion

Per curiam.

In this disciplinary matter, Respondent Thomas P. deRosay filed a Petition for Voluntary Discipline with this Court pursuant to State Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) admitting he had violated Standard 65 (commingling client and personal funds and failure to establish and properly maintain a client escrow account) of State Bar Rule 4-102. Based on deRosay’s admissions and taking into account certain mitigating factors present in this case, we accept the Petition for Voluntary Discipline and hereby order that deRosay be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of six months.

DeRosay wrote checks to himself against a client trust account causing a check disbursing settlement proceeds to a client previously written on this account to be returned unpaid for insufficient funds. Prior to the institution of this proceeding, deRosay made complete restitution to the client. Along with his timely good faith effort to make restitution, we note deRosay’s cooperative attitude toward the proceedings, his full and free disclosure with the disciplinary board, his remorse and letter of apology to the client, the absence of a prior disciplinary record and his physical impairment and personal problems as mitigating factors. See ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, Standard 9.3.

We agree with the State Bar that deRosay’s actions constituted a violation of Standard 65 (commingling client and personal funds and failure to establish and properly maintain a client escrow account) of Bar Rule 4-102. We have reviewed the record and find that suspension is an appropriate sanction in this case. Accordingly, deRosay is hereby suspended for a period of six months from the date of this opinion.

DeRosay is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c) to timely notify all clients of his inability to represent them, to take all actions necessary to protect the interests of his clients, and to certify to this Court that he has satisfied the requirements of such rule.

Six months suspension.

All the Justices concur. *869 Decided January 12, 1998. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Elizabeth W. Morn, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Trent Lee Coggins
879 S.E.2d 502 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
In Re Peterson
725 S.E.2d 252 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
In Re Favors
662 S.E.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
In re Summers
597 S.E.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
In Re Shelfer
597 S.E.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
In re Perry
589 S.E.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
In Re Champion
562 S.E.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
In Re Drucker
556 S.E.2d 129 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
494 S.E.2d 339, 268 Ga. 868, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 150, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-derosay-ga-1998.