Matter of Denti

9 A.3d 1025, 204 N.J. 566, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 6
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 11, 2011
DocketD-98 September Term 2009, 066092
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 A.3d 1025 (Matter of Denti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Denti, 9 A.3d 1025, 204 N.J. 566, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 6 (N.J. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-346, recommending that KENNETH M. DENTI of COLUMBUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, be disbarred for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And KENNETH M. DENTI having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

*567 And it appearing to the Court that the DRB correctly concluded that “[ajlthough respondent’s conduct did not constitute criminal theft and although he was not charged with knowing misappropriation of law firm funds, he carried out a longstanding and pervasive scheme of defrauding two law firms of which he had been a partner, thereby violating his fiduciary obligation to the members of those law firms. By preparing fictitious time sheets, fabricating clients, and submitting phony expense vouchers, respondent engaged in an insidious plot that, coupled with his obvious untruthful testimony, shows a deficiency of character that compels disbarment!;]”

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KENNETH M. DENTI be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that KENNETH M. DENTI be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law and that he comply with Rule, 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by KENNETH M. DENTI pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imo Scott P. Sigman, an Attorney at Law (074489)
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014
In re Sigman
104 A.3d 230 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.3d 1025, 204 N.J. 566, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-denti-nj-2011.