Matter of Davis v. Marshall

2024 NY Slip Op 03297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2024
Docket411 CAF 23-01371
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 03297 (Matter of Davis v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Davis v. Marshall, 2024 NY Slip Op 03297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Davis v Marshall (2024 NY Slip Op 03297)
Matter of Davis v Marshall
2024 NY Slip Op 03297
Decided on June 14, 2024
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 14, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

411 CAF 23-01371

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ROSHEADA DAVIS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

ARDEN MARSHALL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (LUCY ANDERSON BRADO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Tanya Conley, R.), entered May 8, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order granted petitioner an order of protection.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, respondent appeals from an order of protection entered upon a finding that she committed the family offense of aggravated harassment in the second degree against petitioner, her niece (see Penal Law § 240.30; see also Family Ct Act § 812 [1]). Respondent's challenges to the order are not preserved for our review (see Smith v Woods Constr. Co., 309 AD2d 1155, 1157 [4th Dept 2003]; see generally Miller v Miller, 68 NY2d 871, 873 [1986]; Matter of Hill v Trojnor, 137 AD3d 1671, 1672 [4th Dept 2016]), and we decline to review her challenges in the interest of justice.

Entered: June 14, 2024

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HILL, DANIEL T. v. TROJNOR, VICKI L.
137 A.D.3d 1671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Miller v. Miller
501 N.E.2d 26 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Smith v. M.V. Woods Construction Co.
309 A.D.2d 1155 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 03297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-davis-v-marshall-nyappdiv-2024.