Matter of Davis v. Lee

127 A.D.3d 1186, 5 N.Y.S.3d 895
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 2015
Docket2014-05103
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 A.D.3d 1186 (Matter of Davis v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Davis v. Lee, 127 A.D.3d 1186, 5 N.Y.S.3d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated January 18, 2014, which confirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated December 14, 2013, made after a tier II disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules 107.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [i]) and 107.11 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [ii]), and imposing penalties.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s determination that the petitioner violated the subject prison disciplinary rules (see Matter of La Puma v Lee, 115 AD3d 745, 746 [2014]; Matter of Berkoviz v Lee, 102 AD3d 866, 867 [2013]; Matter of Medina v Sing Sing Correctional Facility, 95 AD3d 1331, 1332 [2012]; Matter of Salvatierra v Weeden, 88 AD3d 728, 729 [2011]).

Furthermore, contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report adequately complied with 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 (a) and contained the necessary specificity to apprise the petitioner of the charges against him so as to enable him to prepare an adequate defense (see Matter of Berkoviz v Lee, 102 AD3d at 867; Matter of Medina v Sing Sing Correctional Facility, 95 AD3d at 1332; Matter of Salvatierra v Weeden, 88 AD3d at 729).

Balkin, J.P, Chambers, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lewis v. Lee
138 A.D.3d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Browne v. Capra
137 A.D.3d 1274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.3d 1186, 5 N.Y.S.3d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-davis-v-lee-nyappdiv-2015.