Matter of Davis

2025 NY Slip Op 32731(U)

• Court: Surrogate's Court, New York County
• Decided: August 6, 2025
• Docket: File No. 2022-195
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Matter of Davis 2025 NY Slip Op 32731(U) August 6, 2025 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: File No. 2022-195 Judge: Hilary Gingold Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. ENTERED AUG O6 2025 SURROGATE'S COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNT OF NEW YORK DATA ENTRY DEPT New York County Surrugcitc's Court ------------------------------------------------------------------x Probate Proceeding, Will of File No.: 2022-195 MAUDE DAVIS, aka MAUDE B. DA VIS, aka MAUDE SARGANT DA VIS,

Deceased.

-------------------------------------------------------------------x

GING OLD, S.

By motion dated July 8, 2025, 315 East 70 th Street Apartment Corp. (hereinafter. "E 70 th

St Corp") moved to be allowed to file a verified claim nunc pro tune against the estate of Maude

Davis for unpaid rent in the amount of $81,739.92. The executor of the will, Eva Beale, has not

filed any opposition to the request.

Maude Davis died on March 4, 2021 (hereinafter, "decedent"). On January 11, 2022, the

decedent's January 27, 2020, will was offered for probate by Eva Beale, the nominated successcr

executor thereunder. Letters testamentary issued to Eva Beale on June 13, 2023 (hereinafter,

''executor").

E 70 th St Corp first contacted executor in December 2021 regarding the payment of the

past due rent of the decedent and her estate. Through the years, E 70 th St Corp contacted executor

and her counsel numerous times by letter and by email concerning the unpaid and still accruing

rent. On August 13, 2024, E 70 th St Corp sent a "verified claim" via overnight mail to G.

William Haas, Esq., as the attorney of record for the estate. A copy of this letter was included its

moving papers as Exhibit A.

According to receipts filed by executor, she has made numerous distributions of estate

assets to the residuary beneficiaries, including herself, starting in November 2023.

[* 1] SCP A 1802 provides protection from liability for a fiduciary who makes distributions of

estate assets seven months after the issuance of letters. It is not a statute of limitations and does

not bar the filing of a verified claim against the estate after seven months have passed. (See eg th Matter of Lee, 107 Misc 2d 928, 930 [Sur Ct, Yates County 1981 ].) Thus, E 70 St Corp could

serve executor with a verified claim against the estate pursuant to SCP A 1803 at anytime.

Nonetheless, E 70 th St Corp is seeking nunc pro tune relief. Nunc pro tune relief can be

granted when there is no prejudice or surprise because the facts are not in question and all that is

sought is now a paper to enforce right. (See eg Matter of Miller, 20 Misc 3d 1111 (A) [Sup Ct,

Qui~ens County 2008].) Executor has not denied actual knowledge of the claim for back rent as

of the date of the issuance of her letters.

Though E 70th St Corp's numerous letters and emails to executor and her counsel cannot

be considered a verified claim pursuant to SCPA 1803, executor, as a fiduciary, must act in good

faith in fulfilling her responsibilities to creditors of the estate as well as to the beneficiaries. (See

eg Matter <~/Bailey, 147 Misc 2d 46, 47 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 1990].)

Here, executor had actual knowledge of the claim before her appointment and thus cannot th avail herself to the protections of SCP A 1802 even though E 70 St Corp has not served her with

a verified claim. (Estate <~{Cantarella, NYLJ, July 10, 1989 at 2, col 6 [Sur Ct, Bronx County

July 10, 1989]) [Actual knowledge of the claim vitiates the protection afforded by SCPA 1802];

see also Matter ofSnitkin, 151 Misc 118, 120 [Sur Ct, NY County 1934].)

Moreover, executor made distributions to residuary beneficiaries, including herself,

within the seven-month period. These distributions could not have been made in good faith. (See

e.g. Estate ~/Brosnan, NYLJ, Nov 17, 2998 at 32 [Sur Ct, Nassau County 1998] [creditor of

estate entitled to hearing on whether fiduciary acted in good faith after fiduciary's account settled

[* 2] without including payment as an administrator of an estate will not be discharged from personal

liability for estate debts ifhe knew or should have known of the existence of a debt); Estate of

Cantarella, NYLJ, July 10, 1989 at 2, col 6 [Sur Ct, Bronx County July 10, 1989) [if the

fiduciary knew about the claim he is chargeable for assets paid to beneficiaries in derogation of

the claim]; see also Matter ofSegall, 287 NY 52, 58 [Ct App, 1941); Matter ofScadron, 34 Misc

2d 23, [Sur Ct, NY County 1962)).

Finally, pursuant to SCP A 2205, upon it appearing that it is in the best interests of the

estate, the court may make an order requiring a fiduciary to account. Given the undisputed facts

and the receipts from the charitable beneficiaries, the court is concerned that executor is not

acting in the best interests of both creditors and all the beneficiaries of the estate.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that, the claim of E 70 th St Corp as set forth in its August 13, 2024, "verified

claim" sent via overnight mail to G. William Haas, Esq., attached as Exhibit A to its July 8,

2025, motion, shall be considered a verified claim pursuant to SCPA 1803 that was served on

executor on June 13, 2023; and it is further

ORDERED that, executor is directed to file an account of her proceedings together with a

petition for its judicial settlement on or before November 3, 2025. Executor shall then cause

citation to be issued and service to be made without undue delay on all parties interested in her

accounting proceeding pursuant to SCP A 2210.

[* 3] The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this decision, which constitutes the order of

the Court, by mail to the addresses at the foot hereof.

Dated: August 6, 2025

To:

Dale J. Degenshein, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP ddegenshain@foxrothschild.com Attorneys.for 315 East 70 th Street Apartment Corp.

G. William Haas, Esq. Morrison Cohen LLP bhass@morrisoncohen.com Attorney of Record.for Executor, Eva Beale

Eva Beale, Executor emb29@comcast.net

Mary Kim, Esq. Assistant Attorney General New York State mary .kim@ag.ny.gov

By certified mail Eva Beale Executor 29 Renz Road Mill Valley, California 94941

[* 4]