MATTER OF DAUBNER v. Dinkins

303 N.E.2d 73, 33 N.Y.2d 649, 348 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1053
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In our view, since the irregularities were, to quote from Matter of Ippolito v. Power (22 N Y 2d 594, 597-598), sufficiently large in number to establish the probability that the result would be changed by * * * invalidation ’ ’ of the votes, the order *651 directing a new primary election should be affirmed (see, also, Matter of Mach v. Cocuzzo, 22 N Y 2d 901; Matter of Nodar v. Power, 18 N Y 2d 697).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF DAUBNER v. Dinkins, 303 N.E.2d 73, 33 N.Y.2d 649, 348 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1053 (N.Y. 1973).

303 N.E.2d 73 (MATTER OF DAUBNER v. Dinkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doherty v. Mahoney
59 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)