Matter of Dashawn N. (Youvonne N.)

127 A.D.3d 976, 4 N.Y.S.3d 913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 2015
Docket2014-07643
StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.3d 976 (Matter of Dashawn N. (Youvonne N.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Dashawn N. (Youvonne N.), 127 A.D.3d 976, 4 N.Y.S.3d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeals from (1) an order, made after a permanency hearing, of the Family Court, Westchester County (Michelle I. Schauer, J.), entered June 13, 2014, and (2) an order of the same court, also made after a permanency hearing, entered August 21, 2014. Both orders, insofar as appealed from, directed the Westchester County Department of Social Services to provide the mother with visitation with the children Dashawn N. and Judae N. only at the request of the subject children, and did not direct it to facilitate her ability to telephone or visit the children.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered June 13, 2014, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order entered August 21, 2014; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered August 21, 2014, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in directing that the Westchester County Department of Social Services (hereinafter the DSS) provide the mother visitation with the children Dashawn N. and Judae N. only at the request *977 of the subject children and denying the mother’s application to direct the DSS to make additional diligent efforts to facilitate communications and visitation between her and the subject children. At the time of the first permanency hearing at issue here, one of the subject children was over the age of 18 and the other was near her 18th birthday, and both had elected to remain in foster care (see Family Ct Act § 1055 [e]). The record demonstrates that both children are capable of contacting their caseworker or the mother to arrange for visitation, and the mother has the means to contact both children.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1055
New York FCT § 1055

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.3d 976, 4 N.Y.S.3d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dashawn-n-youvonne-n-nyappdiv-2015.