Matter of Danaysha D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Danaysha D.

121 A.D.3d 432, 993 N.Y.S.2d 314

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2014

Docket13078

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.3d 432 (Matter of Danaysha D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Danaysha D., 121 A.D.3d 432, 993 N.Y.S.2d 314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon her admission that she committed an act that if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On this record, Family Court properly determined that an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would not have been consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection. The underlying incident involved violence, and appellant’s conduct and attendance at school, among other things, gave cause for concern.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon her admission that she committed an act that if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On this record, Family Court properly determined that an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would not have been consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection. The underlying incident involved violence, and appellant’s conduct and attendance at school, among other things, gave cause for concern.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.3d 432, 993 N.Y.S.2d 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-danaysha-d-nyappdiv-2014.