Matter of Dalberth v. Iuppa Battle Company
188 N.E. 66, 262 N.Y. 564, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1087
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matter of Dalberth v. Iuppa Battle Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 N.Y. 537 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument granted to the following extent: Return of remittitur requested and when returned it *565 will be amended by adding the words, “ The court considered the question as to whether section 15, subdivision 5-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Laws of 1930, ch. 316, § 2) was violative of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and found that the subdivision was constitutional.” (See 262 N. Y. 537.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Dalberth v. Iuppa Battle Company, 188 N.E. 66, 262 N.Y. 564, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1087 (N.Y. 1933).
188 N.E. 66 (Matter of Dalberth v. Iuppa Battle Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Dalberth v. Iuppa Battle Company
188 N.E. 54 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)