Matter of Crittenden

21 N.E.2d 691, 280 N.Y. 492, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1342
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause comes here upon a certificate from the Appellate Division that a question of law is involved. Appellant urges that if afforded an opportunity he could refute some of the conclusions drawn from a consideration of the agreement between Malley and himself which was not introduced in evidence in the proceeding and which appellant, therefore, did not have an opportunity to meet or to explain. This may also have a bearing upon the extent of the punishment to be inflicted.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur; O’Brien and Rippey, JJ., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

*494 k

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Crittenden, 21 N.E.2d 691, 280 N.Y. 492, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1342 (N.Y. 1939).

21 N.E.2d 691 (Matter of Crittenden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Crittenden
260 A.D. 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)