Matter of Crigler v. American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 5160
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 2018
Docket2018-04068
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 5160 (Matter of Crigler v. American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Crigler v. American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 5160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Crigler v American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 05160)
Matter of Crigler v American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 05160
Decided on July 11, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 11, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2018-04068

[*1]In the Matter of Seglenda Crigler, petitioner,

v

American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC, respondent.


Seglenda Crigler, New York, NY, petitioner pro se.

Satterlee Stephens LLP, New York, NY (Michael H. Gibson of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to "reverse" an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), dated October 11, 2017, in an underlying action entitled Crigler v American Stock Transfer & Trust, LLC , pending in the same court under Index No. 1363/17.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., COHEN, DUFFY, and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 5160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-crigler-v-american-stock-transfer-trust-llc-nyappdiv-2018.