Matter of Cowan v. Annucci
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3967 (Matter of Cowan v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Cowan v Annucci |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 03967 |
| Decided on May 22, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
2017-01197
(Index No. 2645/16)
v
Anthony Annucci, etc., et al., respondents.
Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. Dasgupta and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Maria G. Rosa, J.), dated December 20, 2016. The judgment, after a hearing, denied the petition.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision properly declined to credit the petitioner with 100 days of jail time the petitioner served in the Nassau County Correctional Center with respect to two convictions rendered against him in August 2014. Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, those 100 days of jail time had already been credited toward a period of postrelease supervision that had been imposed against the petitioner in connection with a 2008 conviction (see Penal Law § 70.30[3]; Matter of Parker v Annucci, 130 AD3d 1115, 1116).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
AUSTIN, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 3967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-cowan-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2019.