Matter of County of Schuyler v. Zucker

135 A.D.3d 1273, 23 N.Y.S.3d 596
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2016
Docket520712
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 A.D.3d 1273 (Matter of County of Schuyler v. Zucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of County of Schuyler v. Zucker, 135 A.D.3d 1273, 23 N.Y.S.3d 596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

*1274 Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Shea, J.), entered October 3, 2014 in Schuyler County, which, among other things, partially granted petitioner’s application, in a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, to, among other things, annul a determination of respondent Department of Health denying petitioner’s claims for certain Medicaid reimbursements.

Our recent cases are dispositive of the issues on appeal in this case involving Medicaid reimbursement for pre-2006 overburden expenses. We agree with Supreme Court’s conclusions that petitioner is entitled to such reimbursement, albeit for a different reason; that is, because petitioner submitted its claims within the six-month grace period (see Matter of County of St. Lawrence v Shah, 124 AD3d 88, 92-93 [2014], lv granted 25 NY3d 903 [2015]; see also Matter of County of Broome v Shah, 130 AD3d 1347, 1347 [2015]; Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 124 AD3d 963, 964 [2015], lv granted 25 NY3d 903 [2015]). “[R]espondent’s challenge to petitioner’s capacity to bring this claim was waived by respondents’ failure to raise capacity as a defense in their answer or a pre-answer motion to dismiss” (Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 124 AD3d at 964; see Matter of County of Broome v Shah, 130 AD3d at 1347-1348). Contrary to respondent’s argument, mandamus relief was properly granted (see Matter of County of St. Lawrence v Shah, 124 AD3d at 94; Matter of County of Broome v Shah, 130 AD3d at 1347).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of County of Delaware v. Zucker
146 A.D.3d 1184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 1273, 23 N.Y.S.3d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-county-of-schuyler-v-zucker-nyappdiv-2016.