Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Montero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Montero

2017 NY Slip Op 6268, 153 A.D.3d 816, 61 N.Y.S.3d 109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 2017

Docket2015-07591

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6268 (Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Montero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Montero, 2017 NY Slip Op 6268, 153 A.D.3d 816, 61 N.Y.S.3d 109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raf-faele, J.), entered August 6, 2015, which, after a framed issue hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Motion by the additional respondent Global Liberty Insurance Company of New York to dismiss the appeal as academic. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 9, 2017, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

During the pendency of this appeal by Country-Wide Insurance Company (hereinafter Country-Wide) from the denial of its petition pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a supplementary uninsured motorist claim, the matter proceeded to arbitration and Country-Wide executed a stipulation of settlement with the claimant settling the matter, which resulted in the issuance of a consent award by the arbitrator. *817 Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed as academic, since the rights of the parties cannot be affected by the determination of this appeal, and no exception to the mootness doctrine is warranted herein (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]; see e.g. Matter of Aidin V. [Giorgio V.], 149 AD3d 757 [2017]; Matter of Pyne v Incorporated Vil. of Southampton Bd. of Historic Preserv. & Architectural Review, 148 AD3d 1155 [2017]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raf-faele, J.), entered August 6, 2015, which, after a framed issue hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Motion by the additional respondent Global Liberty Insurance Company of New York to dismiss the appeal as academic. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 9, 2017, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

During the pendency of this appeal by Country-Wide Insurance Company (hereinafter Country-Wide) from the denial of its petition pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a supplementary uninsured motorist claim, the matter proceeded to arbitration and Country-Wide executed a stipulation of settlement with the claimant settling the matter, which resulted in the issuance of a consent award by the arbitrator. *817 Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed as academic, since the rights of the parties cannot be affected by the determination of this appeal, and no exception to the mootness doctrine is warranted herein (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]; see e.g. Matter of Aidin V. [Giorgio V.], 149 AD3d 757 [2017]; Matter of Pyne v Incorporated Vil. of Southampton Bd. of Historic Preserv. & Architectural Review, 148 AD3d 1155 [2017]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 6268, 153 A.D.3d 816, 61 N.Y.S.3d 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-country-wide-ins-co-v-montero-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack