Matter of Cooperider v. Annucci
This text of 128 A.D.3d 1266 (Matter of Cooperider v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of possession of alcohol and possession of contraband. The charges stemmed from a search of petitioner’s cube that revealed two containers of homemade alcohol. Although other inmates had access to the area where the containers were found, a reasonable inference of possession arises where, as here, the area where the contraband was discovered is within petitioner’s control (see Matter of Velez v Prack, 122 AD3d 1041, 1041-1042 [2014]; Matter of Sweet v Poole, 48 AD3d 867, 868 [2008]). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and petitioner’s testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Starling v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 AD3d 1195, 1196 [2014]; Matter of Sweet v Poole, 48 AD3d at 868; Matter of Vento v Goord, 41 AD3d 1123, 1123 [2007]). Furthermore, petitioner’s contention that he was denied the right to call witnesses is not preserved for our review given his failure to object at the hearing (see Matter of Robinson v Annucci, 122 AD3d 981, 982 [2014]). In any event, his request for character witnesses was properly denied (see Matter of Elias v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1193, 1194 [2014]).
Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D.3d 1266, 8 N.Y.S.3d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-cooperider-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2015.