Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company
68 N.E.2d 872, 296 N.Y. 576, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1171
Opinions
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. FULD, J., dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not "payment * * * of compensation previously awarded" within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: DYE, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company, 68 N.E.2d 872, 296 N.Y. 576, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1171 (N.Y. 1946).
68 N.E.2d 872 (Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Lombardo v. Endicott Johnson Corp.
275 A.D.2d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Claim of Lopa v. Brillo Manufacturing Co.
271 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Claim of Pollock v. Shoe
271 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)