MATTER OF CONSOL. EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment

67 N.Y.2d 783
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 N.Y.2d 783 (MATTER OF CONSOL. EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF CONSOL. EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 67 N.Y.2d 783 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

67 N.Y.2d 783 (1986)

In the Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant,
v.
State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent, and Village of Pleasantville et al., Intervenors-Respondents. (And 167 Other Related Proceedings.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 3, 1986.
Decided March 18, 1986.

Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., Martin B. Cowan, Mark S. Tulis and John Moss Hinchcliff for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Michael S. Buskus, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Michael Whiteman, Melvin H. Osterman, Jr., and Jonathan P. Nye for Village of Pleasantville and others, intervenors-respondents.

Henry J. Smith and James G. Fine for City of Mount Vernon and others, intervenors-respondents.

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (John P. MacArthur of counsel), for City of New York, intervenor-respondent.

Marvin S. Fink for Village of Scarsdale, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the *787 Appellate Division (103 AD2d 453). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Real Property Services
255 A.D.2d 8 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Curiale
205 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Frontier Insurance v. State
160 Misc. 2d 437 (New York State Court of Claims, 1993)
Rokowsky v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
172 A.D.2d 93 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Mogulescu v. 255 West 98th Street Owners Corp.
135 A.D.2d 32 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Ponterio v. Regan
137 Misc. 2d 587 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
Hodes v. Axelrod
116 A.D.2d 75 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 N.Y.2d 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-consol-edison-co-of-new-york-inc-v-state-ny-1986.