MATTER OF CONKLIN v. Arden Farms Dairy Co.

145 N.E.2d 24, 3 N.Y.2d 860
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 N.E.2d 24 (MATTER OF CONKLIN v. Arden Farms Dairy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF CONKLIN v. Arden Farms Dairy Co., 145 N.E.2d 24, 3 N.Y.2d 860 (N.Y. 1957).

Opinion

3 N.Y.2d 860 (1957)

In the Matter of the Claim of Irving Conklin, Sr., Respondent,
v.
Arden Farms Dairy Co. et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
In the Matter of the Claim of Henry I. Sherman, Respondent,
v.
Holland Furnace Co. et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 9, 1957.
Decided July 3, 1957.

Albert P. Thill for appellants.

John M. Cullen for Special Funds Conservation Committee, respondent.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Reagin v. Collins
52 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 N.E.2d 24, 3 N.Y.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-conklin-v-arden-farms-dairy-co-ny-1957.