Matter of Concepcion v. Martuscello
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02258 (Matter of Concepcion v. Martuscello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Concepcion v Martuscello |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 02258 |
| Decided on April 17, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered:April 17, 2025
CV-24-1833
v
Daniel F. Martuscello III, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Calendar Date:March 21, 2025
Before:Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, McShan and Powers, JJ.
Roberto Concepcion, Albion, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Orleans Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Concepcion v Annucci, 231 AD3d 1455, 1455 [3d Dept 2024]). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15, and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant that request and direct respondent to reimburse him that amount.
Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 02258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-concepcion-v-martuscello-nyappdiv-2025.