Matter of Concepcion v. Annucci

2024 NY Slip Op 05381
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 2024
DocketCV-23-1926
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 05381 (Matter of Concepcion v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Concepcion v. Annucci, 2024 NY Slip Op 05381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Concepcion v Annucci (2024 NY Slip Op 05381)
Matter of Concepcion v Annucci
2024 NY Slip Op 05381
Decided on October 31, 2024
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:October 31, 2024

CV-23-1926

[*1]In the Matter of Johnny Concepcion, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date:October 4, 2024
Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Ceresia, McShan and Mackey, JJ.

Johnny Concepcion, Ossining, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge was never collected from petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ballard v Racette, 140 AD3d 1428, 1428 [2016]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Ceresia, McShan and Mackey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ballard v. Racette
140 A.D.3d 1428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 05381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-concepcion-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2024.