Matter of Cohn

2025 NY Slip Op 31914(U)
CourtSurrogate's Court, New York County
DecidedMay 29, 2025
DocketFile No. 2023-838/B
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31914(U) (Matter of Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Surrogate's Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Cohn, 2025 NY Slip Op 31914(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of Cohn 2025 NY Slip Op 31914(U) May 29, 2025 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: File No. 2023-838/B Judge: Hilary Gingold Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. ENTERED MAY 2 9 2025 SURROGATE'S COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DATA ENTRY DEPT New York County Surrogate'a Court -----------------------------------------------------------------------X Petition for a Compulsory Accounting and Related Relief in the Estate of DECISION AND ORDER THEODORE COHN File No. 2023-838/B a/k/a

THEODORE B. COHN Deceased. -----------------------------------------------------------------------X GIN GOLD, S.

Petitioners, Lillian Amato and Cecil Brandon joined by Cynthia Rooney ("petitioners"),

commenced this proceeding to compel an accounting, request the posting of a bond and in the

alternative to revoke preliminary letters testamentary issued to Brian Glubok ("respondent'') in the

estate of Theodore Cohn, deceased. Petitioners also seeks letters of administration, c. t.a. to issue

to Lillian Amato.

The court issued an order dated March 7, 2025 directing respondent to file an account of th his proceedings, together with a petition for judicial settlement, on or before April 30 , 2025. In

a separate decision and order dated March 7, 2025, the court directed the respondent to post a

bond in the amount of Three Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100

($3,250,000) and revoked his preliminary letters dated March I 4, 2023 pending his filing of an

account. A limited evidentiary hearing on the application to fully revoke Respondent's

preliminary letters was directed to be held on May 22, 2025.

Notice of entry together with proof of service for both decisions and orders were filed with

the court. The court also emailed courtesy copies to the respondent's last known mailing and email

address.

[* 1] In seeking the respondent's removal, petitioners allege that the respondent has marshalled

assets of the decedent's estate in excess of $ 1.5 million dollars; used said funds for his own

per.5onal benefit and not in the best interest of the estate by acquiring an investment

property /residential home in Springfield, Illinois titled to the estate and by his own account

residing in it.

No action has been taken to prosecute the probate proceeding since preliminary letters were

issued, nor has an inventory of assets been filed as required by court rule (22 NYC RR 207.20). To

date, no accounting has been filed and no bond has been posted as per court order. Nothing has

been filed to deny petitioner's allegations whether by answer, objection or other proof. In

accordance with statutory requirements, petitioner's allegations are deemed to be due proof of

facts stated in the petition (SCP A § 509).

The court recognizes that removal of a testator's nominated executor is not to be taken

lightly, even if the will has yet to be probated. The court is required to exercise its removal power

sparingly and to nullify the testator's choice only upon a clear showing of serious danger to the

estate. (Matter ofVermilye, 101 AD2d 865 [2d Dept 1984]; Matter o_/Farber, 98 AD2d 720 [2d

Dep 1983}). Here, the actions of the preliminary executor exceeded the scope of his duties as

preliminary executor and his failure to abide by court orders jeopardized the estate and warrant his

removal. Also, as there is now property located outside of this court's jurisdiction purchased with

estate assets and respondent's failure to respond to further communicate with counsel for

petitioners, it would appear to be in the best interest of the estate or of the estate beneficiaries that

letters of administration, c. t.a. issue to the Public Administrator of the County of New York.

Accordingly, the preliminary letters issued to respondent are hereby revoked. Petitioner's

application to appoint petitioner, Lillian Amato as administrator, c.t.a. is denied and letters of

[* 2] temporary administration shall issue to the Public Administrator of the County of New York upon

her duly qualifying according to law. Respondent is directed to turn over custody, possession and

control of all estate assets and books and records to the Public Administrator within 20 days of the

issuance of Letters of Temporary Administration to the Public Administrator. Any application to

admit the will to probate cannot be considered in a removal proceeding and is subject to further

application and order of this court.

Decree signed.

The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this order to the parties whose addresses are

listed below by regular mail and email, if so provided to the court.

rt-- Dated: May~, 2025

[* 3]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Vermilye
101 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 31914(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-cohn-nysurctnyc-2025.