Matter of Cohen v. Board of Regents of the University
This text of 86 N.E.2d 106 (Matter of Cohen v. Board of Regents of the University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Bromley, JJ. Fuld, J., dissents upon the ground that the dental mechanic Gehlberd in constructing and in fitting dentures for petitioner’s patients, did not engage in the practice of dentistry since his every act vis-a-vis those patients was performed in the presence of petitioner and under his direct supervision and control.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 N.E.2d 106, 299 N.Y. 582, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-cohen-v-board-of-regents-of-the-university-ny-1949.