Matter of Cohen v. Board of Regents of the University
86 N.E.2d 106, 299 N.Y. 582, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1043
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Bromley, JJ. Fuld, J., dissents upon the ground that the dental mechanic Gehlberd in constructing and in fitting dentures for petitioner’s patients, did not engage in the practice of dentistry since his every act vis-a-vis those patients was performed in the presence of petitioner and under his direct supervision and control.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Cohen v. Board of Regents of the University, 86 N.E.2d 106, 299 N.Y. 582, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1043 (N.Y. 1949).
86 N.E.2d 106 (Matter of Cohen v. Board of Regents of the University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strizak v. Board of Regents of University
29 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
William Reilly Construction Corp. v. City of New York
70 Misc. 2d 651 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Lynch's Builders Restaurant, Inc. v. O'Connell
103 N.E.2d 531 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)