Matter of Coffey v. Coffey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Coffey v. Coffey

2017 NY Slip Op 2031, 148 A.D.3d 1012, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2017

Docket2016-05197

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2031 (Matter of Coffey v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Coffey v. Coffey, 2017 NY Slip Op 2031, 148 A.D.3d 1012, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the father from an order of commitment of the Family Court, Nassau County (Edmund M. Dane, J.), dated March 31, 2016. The order of commitment, in effect, confirmed an order of fact-finding and an order of disposition of that court (Tomasina Mastroianni, S.M.), dated September 29, 2015, and September 30, 2015, respectively, made after a hearing, finding that the father willfully violated a prior order of child support, and committed him to the custody of the Nassau County Correctional Facility for a period of 180 days. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*1013 We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the father from an order of commitment of the Family Court, Nassau County (Edmund M. Dane, J.), dated March 31, 2016. The order of commitment, in effect, confirmed an order of fact-finding and an order of disposition of that court (Tomasina Mastroianni, S.M.), dated September 29, 2015, and September 30, 2015, respectively, made after a hearing, finding that the father willfully violated a prior order of child support, and committed him to the custody of the Nassau County Correctional Facility for a period of 180 days. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*1013 We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 2031, 148 A.D.3d 1012, 48 N.Y.S.3d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-coffey-v-coffey-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack