Matter of Clemens v. Hodson

204 A.D.3d 1445, 165 N.Y.S.3d 417, 2022 NY Slip Op 02705
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 2022
Docket363.1 CAF 20-01641
StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.3d 1445 (Matter of Clemens v. Hodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Clemens v. Hodson, 204 A.D.3d 1445, 165 N.Y.S.3d 417, 2022 NY Slip Op 02705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Clemens v Hodson (2022 NY Slip Op 02705)
Matter of Clemens v Hodson
2022 NY Slip Op 02705
Decided on April 22, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 22, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

363.1 CAF 20-01641

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MCKENZIE ASHLEY CLEMENS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

BENJAMIN RICHARD HODSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN RICHARD HODSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

MCKENZIE ASHLEY CLEMENS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


WHITEMAN OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP, ALBANY (ROBERT S. ROSBOROUGH, IV, OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

COHEN & COHEN, UTICA (RICHARD A. COHEN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

MICHELLE M. SCUDERI, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Lewis County (Anthony M. Neddo, A.J.), entered November 20, 2020 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted primary physical custody of the subject child to petitioner-respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: April 22, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.3d 1445, 165 N.Y.S.3d 417, 2022 NY Slip Op 02705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-clemens-v-hodson-nyappdiv-2022.