MATTER OF CLEARVIEW GARDENS POOL CLUB, INC. v. Foley

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF CLEARVIEW GARDENS POOL CLUB, INC. v. Foley

200 N.E.2d 217, 14 N.Y.2d 809

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 4, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 200 N.E.2d 217 (MATTER OF CLEARVIEW GARDENS POOL CLUB, INC. v. Foley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF CLEARVIEW GARDENS POOL CLUB, INC. v. Foley, 200 N.E.2d 217, 14 N.Y.2d 809 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

14 N.Y.2d 809 (1964)

In the Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants, and William Grodzinski et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 4, 1964. Decided June 4, 1964.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for appellants.

Gustave A. de Lemos and Murray E. Winnick for respondent.

Jay L. Schwimer and Morrell Schwimer for William Grodzinski and Florence Grodzinski, intervenors-appellants.

Max H. Lome for remaining intervenors-appellants.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

14 N.Y.2d 809 (1964)

In the Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants, and William Grodzinski et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 4, 1964. Decided June 4, 1964.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for appellants.

Gustave A. de Lemos and Murray E. Winnick for respondent.

Jay L. Schwimer and Morrell Schwimer for William Grodzinski and Florence Grodzinski, intervenors-appellants.

Max H. Lome for remaining intervenors-appellants.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 N.E.2d 217, 14 N.Y.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-clearview-gardens-pool-club-inc-v-foley-ny-1964.

Opinion

In the Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club, Inc., Respondent, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants, and William Grodzinski et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants, and William Grodzinski et al., Intervenors-Appellants.