MATTER OF CLARK v. Canandaigua City Sch. Dist.
This text of 602 N.E.2d 228 (MATTER OF CLARK v. Canandaigua City Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Alan Clark, Appellant,
v.
Canandaigua City School District, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Robert W. Zimmerman for appellant.
James A. Spitz, Jr., for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (179 AD2d 1006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
602 N.E.2d 228, 80 N.Y.2d 912, 588 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-clark-v-canandaigua-city-sch-dist-ny-1992.