MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment
This text of 64 N.Y.2d 894 (MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 653) and agree with that court that the method used in calculating the equalization rate was rational and the rate fixed was supported by substantial evidence.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 N.Y.2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-syracuse-v-state-bd-of-equalization-assessment-ny-1985.