Matter of City of Rome v. Board of Assessors

2022 NY Slip Op 00586
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2022
Docket1072 CA 21-00944
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 00586 (Matter of City of Rome v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of City of Rome v. Board of Assessors, 2022 NY Slip Op 00586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of City of Rome v Board of Assessors (2022 NY Slip Op 00586)
Matter of City of Rome v Board of Assessors
2022 NY Slip Op 00586
Decided on January 28, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 28, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

1072 CA 21-00944

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF ROME, PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,

v

BOARD OF ASSESSORS, ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ADIRONDACK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF LEWIS, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


GOLDMAN ATTORNEYS PLLC, ALBANY (PAUL J. GOLDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.

FERRARA FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (KATHERINE E. GAVETT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS AND INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.



Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered December 1, 2020 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order, among other things, granted corrected tax assessments for the tax years 2013-2017.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Aho , 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]).

Entered: January 28, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 00586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-rome-v-board-of-assessors-nyappdiv-2022.