Matter of City of N.Y. (Jamaica Bay)
This text of 5 N.E.2d 191 (Matter of City of N.Y. (Jamaica Bay)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A single question of power in the Supreme Court is involved in the certified question.
Upon this record we find no abuse (as matter of law) of the discretionary power of the Supreme Court. (Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank, 78 N. Y. 487, 489; Matter of Tilden, 98 N. Y. 434, 439; Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325.) This leads to an affirmance.
We leave the merits to be determined upon the new trial which has been granted.
The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Pinch, JJ., concur; Crane, Ch. J., taldng no part.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.E.2d 191, 272 N.Y. 180, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-ny-jamaica-bay-ny-1936.