Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.)

1 N.E.2d 467, 270 N.Y. 368, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1555
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are not in accord "with the ruling below that private easements were created in damage parcel No. 2 as laid out on the map filed by the appel *371 lant’s predecessor m title. The lots conveyed by the appellant with reference to this map front on other streets as shown thereon, do not abut upon damage parcel No. 2, and do not require the use of any part of damage parcel No.- 2 for access to the city system of public streets.

The orders, in so far as they relate to damage parcel No. 2, should be reversed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term for further action.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.), 1 N.E.2d 467, 270 N.Y. 368, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1555 (N.Y. 1936).

1 N.E.2d 467 (Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Ruscio v. Jackson
164 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)