Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.)

1 N.E.2d 467, 270 N.Y. 368, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1555
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 14, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 N.E.2d 467 (Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of City of New York (Wooley Ave.), 1 N.E.2d 467, 270 N.Y. 368, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1555 (N.Y. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are not in accord "with the ruling below that private easements were created in damage parcel No. 2 as laid out on the map filed by the appel *371 lant’s predecessor m title. The lots conveyed by the appellant with reference to this map front on other streets as shown thereon, do not abut upon damage parcel No. 2, and do not require the use of any part of damage parcel No.- 2 for access to the city system of public streets.

The orders, in so far as they relate to damage parcel No. 2, should be reversed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term for further action.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Ruscio v. Jackson
164 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.E.2d 467, 270 N.Y. 368, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-new-york-wooley-ave-ny-1936.