Matter of City of New York

190 N.E.2d 240, 12 N.Y.2d 1051, 239 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1323, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 28, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 190 N.E.2d 240 (Matter of City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of City of New York, 190 N.E.2d 240, 12 N.Y.2d 1051, 239 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1323, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinion

*1053 Order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the claim of the city to sales taxes and general business taxes was not a setoff at the crucial date for the reasons stated in the opinion at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Scileppi dissent in the following memorandum. By express provision of the New York City Sales Tax Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, § N41-6.0), all sales taxes for the period for which a return is required to be filed “ shall be due * * * and payable * * * on the date limited for the filing of the return for such period”. This being so, we believe that the sales taxes “ due and payable ” to the city prior to the time of the Federal tax assessments — as opposed to those which became due and payable after such time — may be set off against the condemnation award made by the city to its taxpayer, with the consequence that the amount of the condemnation award, to which the Federal tax liens could attach, is reduced by the amount of the taxes due the city. In other words, the Federal taxes may be paid out of so much of the award only as remains after payment of the “ due and payable ” city sales taxes. To deny this right of setoff to the city would result in the Federal tax lien attaching to a greater share of the condemnation award than the city’s taxpayer would have been entitled to recover from the city at the time the Federal lien arose. Accordingly, we would answer the certified question in the negative, modify the order appealed from and remand the matter to Special Term so that that court may give proper recognition to the city’s right of setoff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northville Industries Corp. v. State
14 A.D.3d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dresner v. State
242 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Howard v. United States
566 S.W.2d 521 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)
United States v. Mr. Hamburg Bronx Corporation
228 F. Supp. 115 (S.D. New York, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.E.2d 240, 12 N.Y.2d 1051, 239 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1323, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-new-york-ny-1963.