Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company
39 N.E.2d 300, 287 N.Y. 690, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1717
This text of 39 N.E.2d 300 (Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company, 39 N.E.2d 300, 287 N.Y. 690, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1717 (N.Y. 1942).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Solomon v. Russo
229 N.E.2d 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Claim of De Angelis v. Garfinkel Painting Co.
20 A.D.2d 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Claim of Toro v. 1700 First Avenue Corp.
16 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Claim of Ramos v. Taxi Transit Co.
276 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Welz v. Markel Service, Inc.
270 A.D. 15 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Bauss v. Consolidated Chimney Co.
270 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Moran v. Moran Transportation Lines
264 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 N.E.2d 300, 287 N.Y. 690, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-christiansen-v-hill-reproduction-company-ny-1942.