Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company
39 N.E.2d 300, 287 N.Y. 690, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1717
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company, 39 N.E.2d 300, 287 N.Y. 690, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1717 (N.Y. 1942).
39 N.E.2d 300 (Matter of Christiansen v. Hill Reproduction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Solomon v. Russo
229 N.E.2d 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Claim of De Angelis v. Garfinkel Painting Co.
20 A.D.2d 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Claim of Toro v. 1700 First Avenue Corp.
16 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Claim of Ramos v. Taxi Transit Co.
276 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Welz v. Markel Service, Inc.
270 A.D. 15 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Bauss v. Consolidated Chimney Co.
270 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Moran v. Moran Transportation Lines
264 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)