Matter of Christian v. New York City Employees'ret. Sys.
This text of 438 N.E.2d 872 (Matter of Christian v. New York City Employees'ret. Sys.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that the medical board was not arbitrary or capricious in its unanimous conclusion that appellant had failed to sustain his burden of establishing a causal connection between the incident of July 10, 1975 and his disabling cataracts. The board explicated the rationale behind its decision, that decision was warranted by the evidence before the board, and, the issue of causation being one for medical judgment, the board of trustees was entitled to rely on the opinion of the medical board.
*844 Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 N.E.2d 872, 56 N.Y.2d 841, 453 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-christian-v-new-york-city-employeesret-sys-ny-1982.