Matter of Chavich v. Bd. of Exam'rs of the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
210 N.E.2d 359, 16 N.Y.2d 810, 263 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1241
This text of 210 N.E.2d 359 (Matter of Chavich v. Bd. of Exam'rs of the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matter of Chavich v. Bd. of Exam'rs of the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York, 210 N.E.2d 359, 16 N.Y.2d 810, 263 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1241 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Dye, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
King-Smith v. Aaron
317 F. Supp. 164 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
210 N.E.2d 359, 16 N.Y.2d 810, 263 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-chavich-v-bd-of-examrs-of-the-bd-of-educ-of-the-city-of-new-ny-1965.