Matter of Chastain

488 S.E.2d 878, 327 S.C. 173, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 150
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 4, 1997
DocketNo. 24661
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 488 S.E.2d 878 (Matter of Chastain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Chastain, 488 S.E.2d 878, 327 S.C. 173, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 150 (S.C. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent conditionally admits to engaging in misconduct and agrees to a retroactive suspension from the practice of law for ninety days.1 We accept the conditional admission.

Respondent pled guilty to three counts of failure to make and file a South Carolina Income Tax return for the tax years 1989, 1990, and 1993 in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 12-54-40(b)(6)(c) (Supp.1996). Respondent was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of one year and/or a fine of $10,000, provided that the sentence would be suspended upon one year probation and the performance of 80 hours of community service.

The failure to file a tax return is a serious crime as set forth in Paragraph 2(P) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, former Rule 413, SCACR. By his conduct, respondent has violated Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, by committing a criminal act that reflects adversely upon his honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer and has violated Paragraph 5(E), of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, former Rule 413, SCACR, by engaging in conduct tending to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute.

[175]*175In our opinion, respondent’s misconduct warrants a definite suspension from the practice of law for ninety days. Accordingly, respondent is suspended for ninety days, retroactive from the date of this opinion.

DEFINITE SUSPENSION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Randall DeWitt Williams
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2023
In re Chastain
587 S.E.2d 115 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 S.E.2d 878, 327 S.C. 173, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-chastain-sc-1997.