Matter of Chappelle v. . Four Hundred and Twelve Broadway

112 N.E. 1070, 218 N.Y. 632, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1127
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1916·Published

Opinion

*633 Per Curiam.

The only essential difference between this case and the Wilson case, decided herewith, is that the employee who was killéd .was in the service of a corporation owning and operating a loft building. The business of owning and operating a loft building is not one of the hazardous employments embraced within the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the claim dismissed in this case for the reasons stated in Matter of Wilson v. Dorflinger & Sons (218 N. Y. 84.)

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Ouddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Chappelle v. . Four Hundred and Twelve Broadway, 112 N.E. 1070, 218 N.Y. 632, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1127 (N.Y. 1916).

112 N.E. 1070 (Matter of Chappelle v. . Four Hundred and Twelve Broadway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Wilson v. C. Dorflinger & Sons
112 N.E. 567 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)