MATTER OF CBS, INC. v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd.
This text of 429 N.E.2d 813 (MATTER OF CBS, INC. v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On the record the no probable cause decision of the Division of Human Rights was not arbitrary or capricious. Furthermore, it cannot be said that the procedure followed at the division’s investigation conferences, involving written and oral presentations,, constituted either a violation of the statutory scheme (Executive Law, § 297, subd 2; *923 § 297-a, subd 7) or the deprivation of a constitutional right. Due process does not require all the accoutrements of an adversarial trial at every stage of an administrative proceeding (see Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing, 123 U of Pa L Rev 1267).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 N.E.2d 813, 54 N.Y.2d 921, 445 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-cbs-inc-v-state-human-rights-appeal-bd-ny-1981.