Matter of Catrina N.
774 N.E.2d 754, 98 N.Y.2d 688, 746 N.Y.S.2d 689, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1939
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the dispositional order was entered upon movant’s consent and thus movant is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Catrina N., 774 N.E.2d 754, 98 N.Y.2d 688, 746 N.Y.S.2d 689, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1939 (N.Y. 2002).
774 N.E.2d 754 (Matter of Catrina N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mark RR. v. Billie RR.
95 A.D.3d 1602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Forbus v. Stolfi
300 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)