Matter of Caruso v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Caruso v. Burns

2017 NY Slip Op 6413, 153 A.D.3d 1214, 59 N.Y.S.3d 700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 8, 2017

Docket2017-08602

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6413 (Matter of Caruso v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Caruso v. Burns, 2017 NY Slip Op 6413, 153 A.D.3d 1214, 59 N.Y.S.3d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the Putnam County Board of Elections to place the petitioner’s name on the ballot in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2017, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Justice of the Town of Patterson, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Reitz, J.), dated August 25, 2017, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the particular facts of this case, the proceeding was properly dismissed.

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the Putnam County Board of Elections to place the petitioner’s name on the ballot in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2017, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Justice of the Town of Patterson, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Reitz, J.), dated August 25, 2017, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the particular facts of this case, the proceeding was properly dismissed.

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 6413, 153 A.D.3d 1214, 59 N.Y.S.3d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-caruso-v-burns-nyappdiv-2017.