Matter of Carino v. Carino

2018 NY Slip Op 2461
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2018
Docket2017-00774
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 2461 (Matter of Carino v. Carino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Carino v. Carino, 2018 NY Slip Op 2461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Carino v Carino (2018 NY Slip Op 02461)
Matter of Carino v Carino
2018 NY Slip Op 02461
Decided on April 11, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 11, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-00774
(Docket Nos. V-27548-13, V-27549-13, V-27551-13, V-27552-13)

[*1]In the Matter of Albino Carino, respondent,

v

Adela Carino, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Adela Carino, appellant,

v

Albino Carino, respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)


Jeffrey C. Bluth, New York, NY, for appellant.

Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, NY (Lee Tarr and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the children.



DECISION & ORDER

In a child custody proceeding, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ann O'Shea, J.), dated December 12, 2016. The order, upon the mother's default in appearing at a continued hearing, denied her petition for custody of the parties' children and granted the father's petition for custody of the children. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from the order dated December 12, 2016, as it was entered upon the mother's default in appearing at a continued hearing (see Matter of Andrew J.U.M. [Jelaine E.M.], 154 AD3d 758, 758-759; Matter of Iyana W. [Shamark W.], 124 AD3d 418; Matter of Jalaya A.C. [Deidra J.], 112 AD3d 623, 624).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., COHEN, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Matter of Iyana W. (Shamark W.--Tonya B.)
124 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Andrew J.U.M. (Jelaine E.M.)
2017 NY Slip Op 7125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-carino-v-carino-nyappdiv-2018.