MATTER OF CAMUGLIA v. Rohan
174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 745
This text of 174 N.E.2d 533 (MATTER OF CAMUGLIA v. Rohan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF CAMUGLIA v. Rohan, 174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 745 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Foster. Judges Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the determination was purely subjective to the Authority and is not supported by substantial evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority
73 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
P. G. P. Entertainment Corp. v. State Liquor Authority
73 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-camuglia-v-rohan-ny-1961.