Matter of Camarda v. Charlot
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01007 (Matter of Camarda v. Charlot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Camarda v Charlot |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 01007 |
| Decided on February 28, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 28, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
2023-05200
(Docket No. F-8229-09)
v
Marie L. Charlot, respondent.
Joseph Camarda, Belle Terre, NY, appellant pro se.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Alfred C. Graf, J.), dated April 24, 2023. The order denied the father's objections to an order of the same court (Darlene Jorif-Mangane, S.M.) dated March 15, 2023, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.
ORDERED that the order dated April 24, 2023, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to an order of a Support Magistrate, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation. Contrary to the father's contention, he failed to demonstrate the existence of a substantial change in circumstances or that there had been an involuntary reduction in his income by 15% or more since his child support obligation was last modified (see Family Ct Act § 451[3]; Matter of Clarke v Clarke, 193 AD3d 929). Further, the Family Court has no discretion to reduce or cancel arrears which accrue prior to an application for a downward modification of a child support obligation (see Matter of Gardner v Maddine, 112 AD3d 926, 927).
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
IANNACCI, J.P., MALTESE, VOUTSINAS and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 01007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-camarda-v-charlot-nyappdiv-2024.