Matter of Bush

41 A.3d 1276, 210 N.J. 182
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 22, 2012
DocketD-109 September Term 2011, 070609
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 A.3d 1276 (Matter of Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Bush, 41 A.3d 1276, 210 N.J. 182 (N.J. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter have been duly presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20—10(b), following a motion for discipline by consent of EDWARD BENJAMIN BUSH of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984;

And the District IIIA Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated RPC 1.3 and RPC 1.4(b), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined in DRB 12-073 that an admonition is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. IIIA-2011-0013E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20—16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD BENJAMIN BUSH of TOMS RIVER is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*183 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Del Tufo
41 A.3d 1276 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.3d 1276, 210 N.J. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bush-nj-2012.