MATTER OF BULLOCK v. Van Wart
This text of 25 N.Y.2d 812 (MATTER OF BULLOCK v. Van Wart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Ulysses A. Bullock et al., Respondents,
v.
William J. Van Wart et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Westchester County, Respondents, and Jack A. Bornstein, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Jack A. Bornstein, appellant in person.
Robert F. Bowling for petitioners-respondents.
Gordon Miller, County Attorney (Irving Libenson of counsel), for William J. Van Wart and others, constituting the Board of Elections of Westchester County, respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and BREITEL. Dissent: Judge JASEN.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Judge JASEN dissents and votes to reverse and to validate the designating petition of appellant upon the ground that the petition correctly states the office he is seeking.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 N.Y.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bullock-v-van-wart-ny-1969.