Matter of Bryce L. (David B.)
This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3107 (Matter of Bryce L. (David B.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Bryce L. (David B.) |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 03107 |
| Decided on June 3, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 3, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.
2019-07078
(Docket Nos. N-7281-19, N-7282-19)
In the Matter of Harley B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; David B. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)
Brooklyn Defender Services, Family Defense Practice, Brooklyn, NY (Piyali Basak and Kathryn V. Lissy of counsel), for appellant.
James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Julia Bedell of counsel), for respondent.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell and Judith Stern of counsel), attorney for the children.
DECISION & ORDER
In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ilana Gruebel, J.), dated June 12, 2019. The order, after a hearing, found that the father willfully violated a temporary order of protection issued on March 18, 2019, and committed him to a three-month term of incarceration. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 8, 2019, enforcement of the order dated June 12, 2019, was stayed pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements.
The failure of the Family Court to personally serve the appellant with the order to show cause upon initiation of the contempt proceeding was a jurisdictional defect (see Matter of Howard T.P. v Maria B. , 237 AD2d 443; Matter of Minter , 132 AD2d 701). Accordingly, we reverse the order.
LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 NY Slip Op 3107, 184 A.D.3d 563, 123 N.Y.S.3d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bryce-l-david-b-nyappdiv-2020.