Matter of Bruno v. Village of Tuxedo Park Planning Bd.

2017 NY Slip Op 4438, 151 A.D.3d 721, 53 N.Y.S.3d 562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 2017
Docket2015-08334
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4438 (Matter of Bruno v. Village of Tuxedo Park Planning Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Bruno v. Village of Tuxedo Park Planning Bd., 2017 NY Slip Op 4438, 151 A.D.3d 721, 53 N.Y.S.3d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Village of Tuxedo Park Planning Board dated November 5, 2014, granting site *722 plan approval to the respondent CC Road Tuxedo Park, LLC, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated June 10, 2015, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

A local planning board has broad discretion in deciding applications for site-plan approvals, and judicial review is limited to determining whether the board’s action was illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Hejna v Planning Bd. of Vil. of Amityville, 105 AD3d 846 [2013]; Matter of Kearney v Kita, 62 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2009]). Here, the determination of the Village of Tuxedo Park Planning Board had a rational basis, and was not illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Harbor Park Realty, LLC v Mandelik, 116 AD3d 1040 [2014]; Matter of Hejna v Planning Bd. of Vil. of Amityville, 105 AD3d at 846; Matter of Kearney v Kita, 62 AD3d at 1002).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Empire Import-Export of USA, Inc. v. Town of E. Hampton Planning Bd.
2020 NY Slip Op 04941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4438, 151 A.D.3d 721, 53 N.Y.S.3d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bruno-v-village-of-tuxedo-park-planning-bd-nyappdiv-2017.