Matter of Brosius

138 A.D.3d 216, 26 N.Y.S.3d 851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2016
DocketM-5542
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 216 (Matter of Brosius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Brosius, 138 A.D.3d 216, 26 N.Y.S.3d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Martha J. Brosius was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on January 22, 2003, under the name Martha Jane Brosius. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained her principal place of business within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that she has been disbarred upon her conviction of a felony.

Respondent has not appeared in this proceeding after having been served by the Committee at the correctional facility where she is incarcerated.

On June 22, 2015, respondent pleaded guilty in Supreme Court, Nassau County, to two counts of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.40 (1), class C felonies, and one count of scheme to defraud in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 190.65 (1) (b), a class E felony. Respondent admitted to stealing more than $797,000 in funds belonging to clients over a four-year period, many of which involved estate and guardianship matters. Respondent agreed to sign a confession of judgment for restitution in the amount of $797,332.67. On December 8, 2015, respondent was sentenced to 4 to 12 years in prison.

The crimes to which respondent pleaded guilty are felonies under the laws of this State, and therefore upon her conviction thereof, she ceased to be an attorney by operation of law.

Accordingly, the Committee’s petition should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to June 22, 2015.

Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kapnick, JJ., concur.

*218 Respondent disbarred, and her name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to June 22, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Jacques
2025 NY Slip Op 05891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Trubitsky
2025 NY Slip Op 02649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 216, 26 N.Y.S.3d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-brosius-nyappdiv-2016.