Matter of Brigade v. Olatoye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Brigade v. Olatoye

2018 NY Slip Op 8437

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2018

Docket7843 102179/15

StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 8437 (Matter of Brigade v. Olatoye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Brigade v. Olatoye, 2018 NY Slip Op 8437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Matter of Brigade v Olatoye (2018 NY Slip Op 08437)

Matter of Brigade v Olatoye

2018 NY Slip Op 08437

Decided on December 11, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 11, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

7843 102179/15

[*1]In re Elba Brigade, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Shola Olatoye, etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents.

Adriene Holder, The Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn (Perry McCall of counsel), for appellant.

Kelly D. MacNeal, New York City Housing Authority, New York (Andrew M. Lupin of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered May 24, 2017, denying the petition to annul respondent New York City Housing Authority's determination, dated March 12, 2014, which terminated petitioner's tenancy, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for a hearing to determine whether petitioner's mental condition entitles her to a tolling of the statute of limitations.

The medical records submitted on the petition present an issue of fact as to whether petitioner possessed "an over-all ability to function" during the relevant period (see McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am. , 55 NY2d 543, 548 [1982]). Thus, a hearing must be held to determine whether the statute of limitations on this untimely filed proceeding should be tolled for insanity (CPLR 208; see Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx , 300 AD2d 56, 58 [1st Dept 2002]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 11, 2018

CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Brigade v Olatoye (2018 NY Slip Op 08437)

Matter of Brigade v Olatoye

2018 NY Slip Op 08437

Decided on December 11, 2018

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 11, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

7843 102179/15

[*1]In re Elba Brigade, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Shola Olatoye, etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents.

Adriene Holder, The Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn (Perry McCall of counsel), for appellant.

Kelly D. MacNeal, New York City Housing Authority, New York (Andrew M. Lupin of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered May 24, 2017, denying the petition to annul respondent New York City Housing Authority's determination, dated March 12, 2014, which terminated petitioner's tenancy, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for a hearing to determine whether petitioner's mental condition entitles her to a tolling of the statute of limitations.

The medical records submitted on the petition present an issue of fact as to whether petitioner possessed "an over-all ability to function" during the relevant period (see McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am. , 55 NY2d 543, 548 [1982]). Thus, a hearing must be held to determine whether the statute of limitations on this untimely filed proceeding should be tolled for insanity (CPLR 208; see Santana v Union Hosp. of Bronx , 300 AD2d 56, 58 [1st Dept 2002]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 11, 2018

CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2018 NY Slip Op 8437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-brigade-v-olatoye-nyappdiv-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack