Matter of Branch v. Annucci

133 A.D.3d 942, 18 N.Y.S.3d 567
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 2015
Docket520078
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 133 A.D.3d 942 (Matter of Branch v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Branch v. Annucci, 133 A.D.3d 942, 18 N.Y.S.3d 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

*943 Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violent conduct and making threats. Initially, respondents concede, and we agree, that substantial evidence does not support the charge of violent conduct. Accordingly, we annul that part of the determination, but need not remit the matter for a redetermination of the penalty because the penalty has been completed and no loss of good time was imposed (see Matter of Hobson v Prack, 127 AD3d 1370, 1371 [2015]). Turning to the remaining charge, the misbehavior report, letter written by petitioner and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Alston v Goord, 25 AD3d 852, 852 [2006]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, statements in the letter could be viewed as threatening conduct which exceeds that sanctioned under Correction Law § 138 (4) and which violated the disciplinary rule that prohibits making threats (see e.g. Matter of Cabassa v Kuhlmann, 173 AD2d 973, 974 [1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 858 [1991]). Furthermore, we find no merit in petitioner’s assertion that his 1st Amendment constitutional rights were violated (see Matter of Marhone v LaValley, 107 AD3d 1186, 1187 [2013]; Matter of Koehl v Fischer, 52 AD3d 1070, 1071 [2008], appeal dismissed and lv denied 11 NY3d 809 [2008]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of violent conduct; petition granted to that extent and respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references to this charge from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Washington v. Howard
2024 NY Slip Op 02115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Williams v. Annucci
2017 NY Slip Op 6694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Brown v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision
139 A.D.3d 1214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Clarke v. Venettozzi
139 A.D.3d 1221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Williams v. Smith
138 A.D.3d 1330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Mohamed v. Prack
137 A.D.3d 1402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Chisholm v. Annucci
135 A.D.3d 1279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.3d 942, 18 N.Y.S.3d 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-branch-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2015.